list of previoous GPGtool SHA1 hases
Is there a list of previous SHA1 hashes?
Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
? | Show this help |
---|---|
ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
r | Focus the comment reply box |
---|---|
^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘
instead of Control ^
on Mac
Support Staff 1 Posted by Steve on 18 Jan, 2017 07:57 PM
Hi,
no we don't maintain a list for previous releases. The current GPG Suite contains important security fixes and provides overall better stability.
Is there a specific reason you would want to use an old release?
All the best,
steve
2 Posted by foruminformatio... on 19 Jan, 2017 08:58 PM
I am not running the latest version but the previous GPGtools version and I would lie to verify the validation of that SHA hash as the software is working on one machine but not the other.
How is it possible that a secure application does not have a record of the SHA hash of at least previous developments?
Support Staff 3 Posted by Steve on 19 Jan, 2017 09:17 PM
Hm, I am not sure if something is not working, why you would not download the update and see if the latest version fixes your problem.
Also I don't know yet, what is not working for you.
Support Staff 4 Posted by Luke Le on 19 Jan, 2017 09:23 PM
Please tell us what version you have currently installed. Based on that we will be able to tell you the hash
Support Staff 5 Posted by Luke Le on 19 Jan, 2017 09:30 PM
Following are the hashes for the few last releases:
2016.08 (v1): be125df775ade791c7d03f9ba2309e07c3737f59
2016.08 (v2): 6adb52ce063b3952542037fa37394a0279acce3d
(there was a small problem with the updater in the v1 one) 2016.10: da8854cd9435d077dbdac7e71dac920ac38d15f2
Hope that helps.
6 Posted by foruminformatio... on 21 Jan, 2017 11:59 PM
I have 6adb52ce063b3952542037fa37394a0279acce3d GPG_Suite-2016.08_v2.dmg.
Which verifies with your value.
However I would highly recommend that at least the previous hashes be kept on file for verification because if there is a problem with the latest version people would like to roll back to the previous version and validate the hash. Many other security sites do this such as firefox and tunnelblick. I am sure you don't trash previous versions.
This case can be closed
Support Staff 7 Posted by Steve on 22 Jan, 2017 12:05 AM
Thanks for your feedback.
Kindly,
steve
Steve closed this discussion on 22 Jan, 2017 12:05 AM.